The Adidas Texas Tech RED Raiders Adizero EVO SL EXO and Hoka Cielo X1 3.0 are both neutral road running shoes with firm, responsive cushioning. The Texas Tech RED Raiders Adizero EVO SL EXO costs about $147 less (from $128) and is rated higher by buyers (4.8 vs 4.1 out of 5). The Cielo X1 3.0 is 0.7 oz lighter (7.5 oz vs 8.2 oz).
Bottom line: Pick the Texas Tech RED Raiders Adizero EVO SL EXO if you want to spend less; pick the Cielo X1 3.0 if you want the lighter shoe.
Adidas
Texas Tech RED Raiders Adizero EVO SL EXO
4.8 (97)
$128
Shop at Adidas→ Colors & full specs →
Specs side by side
| Spec | Texas Tech RED Raiders Adizero EVO SL EXO | Cielo X1 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $128 | $275 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 (97 reviews) | 4.1 / 5 (11 reviews) |
| Weight | 8.2 oz | 7.5 oz |
| Heel-to-toe drop | 7 mm | 7 mm |
| Heel stack height | 39 mm | — |
| Cushioning | Firm / Responsive | Firm / Responsive |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral |
| Plate | None | Carbon |
| Surface | Road | Road |
| Available for | Men & Women | Men & Women |
Specs and prices from Adidas and Hoka, checked 2026-11-02. Weight is usually for a men's size 9–10.
Which should you get?
Get the Texas Tech RED Raiders Adizero EVO SL EXO if…
- you want to spend less
- you want the more widely reviewed shoe
Get the Cielo X1 3.0 if…
- you want the lighter shoe
More comparisons
- Adidas Texas Tech RED Raiders Adizero EVO SL EXO vs Hoka Rocket X 3
- Adidas Texas Tech RED Raiders Adizero EVO SL EXO vs Adidas Adizero EVO SL EXO
- Adidas Texas Tech RED Raiders Adizero EVO SL EXO vs ASICS GEL-PULSE 17
- Adidas Texas Tech RED Raiders Adizero EVO SL EXO vs Adidas Adizero EVO SL EXO Suede
- Hoka Cielo X1 3.0 vs Adidas Adizero EVO SL
- Hoka Cielo X1 3.0 vs ASICS BLOOMSTRIDE
- Hoka Cielo X1 3.0 vs Nike Zoom Fly 6
- Hoka Cielo X1 3.0 vs Adidas Adizero EVO SL EXO